India

Rajasthan Congress chief whip strikes SC towards HC order on MLA’s disqualification course of | India Information

Summary

NEW DELHI: Rajasthan Congress chief whip Mahesh Joshi on Friday moved the Supreme Courtroom towards Excessive Courtroom order of July 24 asking the meeting speaker to defer disqualification continuing towards sacked deputy chief minister Sachin Pilot and 18 MLAs. The […]

NEW DELHI: Rajasthan Congress chief whip Mahesh Joshi on Friday moved the Supreme Courtroom towards Excessive Courtroom order of July 24 asking the meeting speaker to defer disqualification continuing towards sacked deputy chief minister Sachin Pilot and 18 MLAs.
The chief whip has moved the highest court docket two days after the meeting speaker CP Joshi filed the enchantment towards the July 24 Rajasthan Excessive Courtroom order.
The plea filed by advocate Varun Chopra stated that the Excessive Courtroom order is “ex-facie unconstitutional, unlawful and within the enamel of the regulation laid down by this court docket in 1992 verdict within the case of Kihoto Hollohon”.
The 1992 judgement had held that the speaker has the authority to resolve the disqualification proceedings and judicial intervention within the course of is “not permissible”.
The Rajasthan Meeting Speaker On July 29 had moved the highest court docket difficult the July 24 order of the excessive court docket which had directed upkeep of establishment on the disqualification discover issued to 19 dissident Congress MLAs, together with sacked deputy chief minister Sachin Pilot.
In his petition, Speaker C P Joshi, has sought keep on the Rajasthan Excessive Courtroom’s order contending that it’s “ex-facie unconstitutional” and is a “direct intrusion” into the area solely reserved for the Speaker below the Tenth Schedule of the Structure.
The Speaker’s plea, settled by senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Vivek Tankha, has additionally sought keep on additional proceedings within the matter pending earlier than the Excessive Courtroom.
The Speaker’s plea, filed by advocate Sunil Fernandes, claimed that the excessive court docket’s order is a “direct interference” within the ‘proceedings of the Home’ below the Tenth Schedule which is prohibited below Article 212 of the Structure.
On July 27, the highest court docket had allowed the Meeting Speaker to withdraw his plea towards the excessive court docket’s July 21 order asking him to defer until July 24 the disqualification proceedings towards these MLAs.
The meeting Speaker had issued the discover to those MLAs on July 14 after the ruling Congress had complained to him that the legislators had defied a whip to attend two legislature get together conferences.
The excessive court docket had handed the order on the plea filed by these MLAs who’ve challenged the disqualification discover issued to them.
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: